Hillary, too corrupt or too stupid…
Hi Brit,
I came across this, Clintons’ Charity Not Listed On Senate Disclosure Forms, and now I’m torn between the ideas that Hillary is too corrupt for the Presidency, or that she’s too stupid to hold that office. Truly, she was stupid to think that a candadate for our highest office could sneak this past even our liberal press. However, considering that her chairty is donating to:
and a charity connected to the Arkansas businessman who helped Hillary Clinton make $100,000 on a commodities trade that stirred controversy a decade ago
which businessman, if I read the twisted record of her illicite financial activity, is Robert L. “Red†Bone, Senator Clinton also reeks of corruption. However, it’s stupid corruption, assuming she really wants to be President, so I am confused. Still, one thing is certain, she’s evil:
The foundation has enabled the ClintonscandidateCharityillicit to write off more than $5 million from their taxable personal income since 2001, while dispensing $1.25 million in charitable contributions over that period.
How else can a person who deprives the poor of $3.75 million through accounting tricks be labeled? Although, this also makes her a hypocrite, considering her stand on the need for the Government to wring more tax money from the rich, and she obviously falls into that category. Oh, what a complex and warped person she is.
the Grit
Posted: February 27th, 2007 under Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Senate, United States, business, corruption, crime, law, liberal, liberal press, news, opinion, politics.
Comments: 7
Comments
Comment from Wytammic
Time: February 27, 2007, 6:37 pm
Hi Grit –
I’m short on time and haven’t even read this post. Promise though, I’ll get back to it:)
Anyway, just wanted to comment on the title:
Both (that’s my final answer)
Comment from the Grit
Time: February 27, 2007, 7:44 pm
Hi W,
We’re open late. No rush 
the Grit
Comment from elizabeth jackson
Time: February 28, 2007, 12:46 am
wow. what ever happened to practicing what you preach. i guess that has never applied to the clintons.
Comment from wytammic
Time: February 28, 2007, 3:06 am
Great, you are still open 
Nevertheless, I have to stick with my first response, she is too corrupt and too stupid. The nerve really doesn’t surprise me.
Comment from thelonedrifter
Time: February 28, 2007, 3:53 am
Make no mistake, Hillary’s not stupid. She may be a hypocrite, and she may be dangerous, but she’s not stupid. You see, the issue is, she’s wrong. Furthermore, she’s a politician who’s wrong. And beyond that, she’s a politician who’s hypocritically wrong. She thinks she’s right. Those things make her dangerous, but also vulnerable.
Comment from the Grit
Time: February 28, 2007, 1:15 pm
Hi t,
Good point. At least she provides lots of inspiration for writing
the Grit
Pingback from We Need Another Dickens « Wit or Wisdom
Time: February 28, 2007, 10:35 pm
[...] Another institution Dickens would have a lot of fun with is the tolerance pushers. I think he would gleefully point out their double-standards, like white people who shoot at cops and then get thrown in jail for the rest of their lives deserve it, while black people who shoot at cops get out because Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton comes to protest. He would very much enjoy creating a liberal activist or congressman character for one of his books, so that he could show how they jump all over other supposed corruptions and then try to hide their own. (See Grit talk about it.) [...]
Write a comment