Speaker Pelosi, the terrorists friend
Hi Brit,
I believe it’s been pretty well established that the civilized world is at war with Islamic Terrorists. It’s also been pretty well established that the rulers of Syria give aid and comfort to Islamic Terrorists. This is why we have severed diplomatic relations with that country.  Which makes me ask, after seeing this, Pelosi Going to Syria Despite Objections, why the Democrats are cozying up to these people?
While it’s obvious Nancy P. hates the US, liberty, freedom, and such, there are plenty of other dictators around who share her values that she could have tea with. Thus we have to ask, why Syria? It’s not for illegal campaign contributions, because Syria doesn’t have that much spare cash. It’s not to exchange political favors, since the things Syria wants would never pass even with Pelosi’s demonic influence.
However, there was all that traffic from Iraq just before we invaded. A lot of people think that weapons of mass destruction made up a good bit of the cargo. The most positive public opinion for the Bush Administration comes from the fact that the terrorists haven’t been able to strike in America again. Now, think about the political advantage the liberals would gain if, somehow, a few canisters of nerve gas found their way into the US, then into the hands of a terrorist cell. Add this thought to the Speaker’s insistence on having a larger plane assigned to her.
A flight of fancy? Sure. My paranoia surfacing?  Most likely. Still, I sure hope that someone searches that plane when it gets back.
the Grit
Vicki says:
March 31st, 2007 at 2:54 pm
Nancy Pelosi is giving me heartburn this week.
I think it’s completely questionnable that there is a ‘bipartisan’ trip planned to meet with some of the these leaders in the Middle East. The White House has such limited contact with the Syrians for a reason: they’re a bunch of skunks that we suspect of all sorts of bad deeds. That Pelosi thinks it’s just fine to go where she’s been told not to go is yet another insult by the bipartisans into the foreign relations policy set forth by the White House.
Like Bush or not, he’s in charge and I find Pelosi nothing more than someone who wants to undermine everything he does. That has nothing to do with our relationship to Syria.
Take a slow cablecar back to California, Pelosi!
the Grit says:
March 31st, 2007 at 3:27 pm
Hi Vicki,
I think it would be funny, as an April Fools joke, if Bush ordered the Air Force jet she went on, to leave without her.
the Grit
civis ordinarius says:
March 31st, 2007 at 7:38 pm
There is no conspiracy – Speaker Pelosi is campaigning on behalf of the Dems for the Presidency in 2008. She is telling the Syrians to “hang on”, American defeat is on the way.
the Grit says:
March 31st, 2007 at 7:44 pm
Hi CO,
Of course. The question is how far will the Wicked Witch of the House go in her quest?
the Grit
mommy zabs says:
March 31st, 2007 at 10:59 pm
well i totally dislike pelosi. and I too totally think the WMD’s are there.
however, your suggestion she is bringing stuff back kinda ranks with rosie’s theories
but you were joking right?
Vicki says:
March 31st, 2007 at 11:34 pm
Oh, I think Pelosi has held the Speaker’s office long enough that she can take a few conspiracy theories now. Serves her right.
Machiavelli says:
April 1st, 2007 at 3:00 am
We definitely are on the same wavelength on this one.
http://thevirtuousrepublic.com/C20070322220056/E20070331214801/index.html
the Grit says:
April 1st, 2007 at 11:55 am
Hi ladies,
Well, conspiracy theories have to start somewhere
Hi M,
Nice post, and thanks for the mention. I’ve got you on my reading list.
the Grit
surfsander says:
April 1st, 2007 at 11:47 pm
Um,… isn’t what she is doing illegal? As an unsanctioned diplomat from the United States speaking on behalf of the congress without Presidential approval she can be tried for treason. Oh yeah, silly me, it’s only when the Republicans do something that MIGHT even be questionable do they bring up the legality of the actions but since she is a Democrat I guess it’s alright. Carry on Nancy, and sorry for questioning your actions. In the future I will follow your lead and only point out that everything is the President’s fault. I guess now, it was Bush’s fault that the military budget got cut.
F***ing traitor!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
surfsander says:
April 1st, 2007 at 11:56 pm
Sorry, they are trying to cut the budget in Iraq, with the President’s veto let’s hope that it never happens.
the Grit says:
April 2nd, 2007 at 11:47 am
Hi s,
The problem with Bush having to veto the Iraq funding bill is that it will delay getting a proper bill long enough to mess up a bunch of scheduled military stuff. No surprise since liberals have always hated the military.
the Grit